Maybe the California Attorney General should investigate HCSO and any potential conflicts of interest and whether there is inteference by biased parties in the Miranda's Rescue investigation?

 

If you read my prior coverage on the Miranda Rescue coverage, you know who Jennifer Raymond is, who Jenna aka Chrisjenna Moore is and you know that Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal's wife commented twice on Jenna Moore's Facebook account. Other media never mentioned this but who's surprised?

I blocked Jenna Moore and others due to reasons anyone following this Fortuna reality show knows and anyone who has witnessed, seen and read how Humboldt deals with independent reporting and the way I have been treated so I do not know if there were more instances and I do not post hearsay or claims without evidence.

There is another alleged potential conflict of interest between Jenna Moore and HCSO I am trying to verify. I learned about this after one of my earlier posts and it will not be easy to confirm for obvious reasons. It isn't something I can submit a PRA and get a response. Even if I could, the PRA can be ignored.

Just yesterday, I learned that Jenna Moore and Jody Honsal are friends. This tip did not come from Shannon and it did not come from law enforcement. I cannot tell you who my source is but if Jody Honsal is pissed, 1. she should realize in a small county where she is the spouse of the Sheriff; she needs to have better discretion and judgement 2. How confident is she about who she can trust in her inner circle? 3. She needs to direct her ire at herself and chose better "friends" and 4. her homegirl Jenna Moore's need to be the "star" of the Humboldt Facebook reality show has put Jody under scrutiny. 

Besides glaring at me and ignoring me, Billy aka Sheriff Honsal has not addressed the inappropriateness of his wife commenting on an ongoing investigation in which Jenna Moore is a key player. Jenna Moore put herself out there front and center on Facebook, orhanizing protests and talking with media. 

For days now, the anti Shannon Miranda zealots have been leaking out information HCSO has not released. The HCSO investigation is not complete and until there is a report, the DA cannot make a determination whether charges will be filed.

So why is it that the anti Shannon Miranda group is claiming that HCSO has decided there is not enough evidence and Shannon will not be charged. I have read about this in other media coverage; I have heard about it from at least five different, unrelated people. There are people I have had discussions with who are more informed about the law and the criminal justice system and with the limited official information released, their opinion is that criminal or serious charges are unlikely. Whether civil or environmental violations exist; there is no official information released to make that determination.

Why do the anti Shannon Miranda contingent have information that even the media does not have access to about a public interest investigation? Maybe the California Attorney General should investigate HCSO and any potential conflicts of interest and whether there is interference by biased parties in the Miranda's Rescue investigation?

All these people spouting off on Facebook and speaking to media stand by their words so they should welcome the CA Attorney General's involvement into this investigation they have kept in the news cycle for weeks.

Before the other media, especially the local media, demand an interview with Shannon Miranda; they need to stop the selective coverage, ask the questions I have about HCSO and by doing that I am risking further wrath. Journalism should hold those in power accountable. The rest of Humboldt "media" owned by the good ole boys and gals does selective coverage and this is just one example. The other local media follow up on what I write but not when Jody Honsal is involved?