**I reported on the blanket disqualification in 2023.**
On an extremely busy morning, with multiple cases on in different courtrooms, I chose to cover the Daryl Jones hearing first. Humboldt Superior Court Presiding Judge Kelly Neel made a dislosure. It is my choice not to name Judge Neel's daughter even though she stated the first name on record. She is a child and as a judge's daughter, extra caution is necessary.
People explained why 170.1 wasn't filed and said they are exercising 170.6. Defense challenged it. Now we are waiting for Humboldt Superior Court Judge Timothy Canning to hear the challenge and whether it gets sent back to Judge Neel or not. Defense asked for time to get documentation from court about DA's blanket disqualification of Judge Neel. I wrote about this in 2023. There was a lot said including defense bringing up recent Supreme Court ruling on 170.6.
"In J.O. v. Superior Court (2026) 80 Cal.App.5th / ___ Cal.5th ___, the California Supreme Court ruled that courts can now look behind peremptory judicial disqualification motions (under CCP § 170.6) if there is a prima facie showing of bad-faith "blanket" challenges aimed at removing a specific judge.Prior to this unanimous decision, a § 170.6 challenge was virtually automatic; filing an affidavit or oral statement asserting prejudice meant the judge had to be reassigned without any inquiry. The new landmark ruling drastically changes how courts can handle repeat challenges." --summary on Google from Justia Law and Wilmer Law.
The California Supreme Court decision in J.O. vs Superior Court of San Joaquin County was unanimous.
If Judge Neel is disqualified, that would make her the 5th judge who cannot hear this case. Judge Steven Steward, Judge Lawrence Killoran, Judge Cockrum and Judge April Van Dyke have recused themselves.
I have included court minutes, detailed live coverage and the actual ruling.
Court minutes:
Live coverage:
Judge Neel said, "my daughter attended Arcata High School during that time. That is not going to impact my ability to be fair and impartial i this matter. I don't know if my daughter was in school that day."
Mr. Rees said, "People were planning to file a 170.1. It was rejected for form reasons. I have 170.6. " Mr. Rees filed it in court.
Ms. O'Connell said she was challenging the 170.6 and mentioned the Supreme Court ruling.
Ms. O' Connell said she is submitting on Dr. Brunetto's report.
Mr. Rees said there will be additional statements from victims and gave a time estimate of half a day.
The case was sent to Humboldt Superior Court Assistant Presiding Judge to hear the challenge.
"If it comes back to me, " said Judge Neel, "parties need to look at having this hearing on Thursday afternoon."
Ms. O'Connell told Judge Canning, "It is the practice of the D.A's office to to do a blanket disqualification of Judge Neel. To get the information needed, Ms. O'Connell said she needs two weeks.
"I think the Court needs to proceed right now, " said Mr. Rees. "The Court cannot make objections without evidence."
"The Court has a percentage of how many disqualifications the DA's office has made against Judge Neel. I have seen it play out in the courtroom."
"The recent Supreme Court decision in J.O. does not go into details about procedure. I do think it is fair to give Ms. O'Connell a chance to make a case of abuse of the 170.6 process. The Court will make ruling at that time."
July 1 is the court date when the prima facie hearing.