Last night, late after a long, exhausting day, I got a call from someone. Person A. I called back but in the future this person is going to have to leave a message like anyone else. I called Person A back because I thought it was urgent and news related. This person also appreciates and values my hard work and like my local supporters means well but unfortunately last night, got caught up in the typical Humboldt drama of someone says something to someone, they think it is news and there is evidence and other local media contacted has not done anything to let's call John. That is going to stop. All tips unless it is breaking news must be sent via email or text and then patience for me to respond. No one has access to me 24 hours. If you want that, you better pay for it and support my work and compensate me for my time at a rate I am not negotiating.
Person A did preface and say, check out and see if this is true.
Person A did not have all the information and heard it from Person B so then I had to call Person B. At this time, based on what I was told, I had reason to rush. That turned out not to be the case. Person B was fearful and did not want their name used and didn't have enough direct evidence and finally gave me contact information for Person C.
This is the second time my time has been wasted because instead of just giving me the person's contact information; other people want to be involved and have incorrect information. I don't need a mediator. If that is how you operate, call other media. I don't need the scoop, I don't need the hassle and while I told Person B and C, I will keep them confidential for the initial post; anonymity is misused in Humboldt. Your coworker, neighbor, former employer and being awkward for you is not my problem; you want to use me, my platform, let me be retaliated against for something that benefits you. That is not going to happen. I have done that for 12 plus years and Humboldt has taken advantage of me. The kind of investigative reporting you want me to do is time consuming, risky and if you are not willing to cover my costs, including consultation with a lawyer because of the flimsy tip or risk involved, ; don't call me. Feel free to call other media who have the bucks and can afford lawyers. I have enough work and news to do. Let other media have the "glory" if they are willing to cover what I do, stand up to the powers to be and be effective. They are good at fluff and spin.
Had I just called Person C, I would be in a better position to evalauate the tip. By the time, I got to Person C, got what I thought was the correct information and some evidence which after initial verification on my own further raised red flags for me; it had been three hours of my evening wasted and another three hours this morning.
The tip was about Shannon Miranda. I repeatedly asked Person A and B if Chrisjenna Moore was involved. They said no. They were wrong. She is; I appreciate Person C being honest when I asked Person C because I had a feeling. Read my post on Chrisjenna Moore and Humboldt Superior Court Commissioner Sarah Kaber's ruling. Chrisjenna Moore has no credibility with me.
Some of what I was told by Person C was easily dispelled by me checking the Miranda Rescue website.
I don't know if other people involved or Chrisjenna Moore have contacted other media. Person C contacted Thad Greenson who was hesitant and said he had to talk to his boss. I did not realize Thad was still doing news.
I spoke with Shannon right now briefly and HCSO is on the way there at 10. He had an explaination. And I will be calling him later about the alleged claims. Shannon knows who is behind this and while I did not say anything about Person C, Chrisjenna Moore has no expectation of confidentiality from me. Shannon on his own guessed Person C's name.
Shannon not only has an explaination but he called HCSO himself about some animals and this claim about the hole. The people claiming Shannon did something wrong didn't even mention the other animals. Dogs, a goat and pony.
After speaking to Shannon and after HCSO goes there, I cannot guarantee Person C confidentiality because I have been lied to, given information and some already dispelled by my research. I am really irritated that there are people who keep trying to smear Shannon without evidence that does not pass the smell test with me; let alone in a court of law based on what I was told.
This "dead dog" claim has now surfaced three times with no verifiable evidence. A lot of speculation and conjecture and some claims and some of "evidence" by Chrisjenna Moore that I have not seen nor do I believe. As long as Chrisjenna is involved; I don't believe anything coming from her.
Until HCSO, the Humboldt County DA or some organization with the appropriate authority investigates; I would be foolish to repeat the claims by the people involved. I may include them when I speak to Shannon later to provide context.
There are some other concerns Person C raised which I thought deserved some investigating. Shannon Miranda is well connected. And, he has also been the target consistently of rumors. Shannon has always spoken with me and he addressed one of the speculations by Person C on his own today and told me he contacted HCSO himself.
Chrisjenna Moore I was told contacted HCSO informally. I know who she spoke with and for now, I will not reveal that information. HCSO was supposedly going to look into it and again, I will not say what I was told because without an incident number and formal report, there is no way for me to formally follow up with HCSO.
So, why am I doing this post? In my exhausation last night and talking to three people; Person A and B talking very fast and calling and texting me while I am trying to write down what Person C is saying; Person A and B who are relaying information to me in "Chinese whisper" claimed HCSO was hesitant and want to take their time building a case because they messed up the Ray Christie case. Again, I don't know if HCSO said this and given what I found out in a few hours with my own independent verification; this is a a whole lot of drama from people with an agenda against Shannon Miranda.
I just spoke with Person A and told Person A exactly what I wrote in this post.
Person C shared me two pieces of information or "evidence." I am not going to include because I want to see if HCSO follows up and only someone with appropriate experience and authority can verify that "evidence."
The other one is a video Person C has of Shannon from 4/26 and I am not going to include that information based on HCSO doing follow up right now but it involves a hole on Shannon's property.
I will be calling Shannon later to do a separate follow up.
Related posts:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.