Fred or Free Speech Humboldt both epxlain your blatant lie about my coverage on the Matthew Steele case

Free Speech Humboldt, you posted a blatant lie on Facebook. You said I ignored the Matthew Steele case.

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/01/child-pornography-suspect-matthew.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/06/pre-plea-report-and-mental-health.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/07/matthew-steele-plead-to-possession-of.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/01/matthew-aaron-steele-arrested-for.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/04/i-year-of-prison-time-maybe-probation.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/09/since-i-had-already-reported-on-matthew.html?m=

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/01/ramey-warrant-for-matthew-aaron-steele.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2017/09/since-i-had-already-reported-on-matthew.html?m=

You made a remark about me that is slander and defamatory. How convenient that Fred is counsel for Free Speech Humboldt ? Of course, you did it with an anonymous page.

Always anonymous, these similar remarks made about me. So, who is behind all these anonymous pages and blogs? They all have the same script and particular people they target. 

I didn't know Fred existed before 2016 nor have I ever spoken to him. 

Fred has a lot of assumptions and because I called him out on his smear tactics, he and others (anonymously) think it is okay to lie about me and say whatever they want? Is it election season related? Am I just collateral damage as Kent Sawatzky mentioned? Or do they want to control what you the public should know? 

Related posts:

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2018/05/fred-i-keep-receiving-these-but-no-more.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2018/05/honesty-is-obvious-not-something-that.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2018/05/smear-tactics-by-anons-have-zero.html?m=1

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2018/05/is-kent-sawatzky-trying-to-warn-me-or.html?m=1