Oct 9, 2017

A new blog in town pulls the mask off Humboldt Grassroots


This person's original craigslist post exposing Humboldt Grassroots was flagged. Undeterred, that person put the content up now on a new blog.


http://anticuckaction.blogspot.com/2017/10/humboldt-grassroots-eurekas-antifa.html?m=1

Not sure what Juan Ferrer, Nicholas Stoiber and Sophie Rocheleau have to do with Humboldt Grassroots? The rest of the content I have seen before.

Many of the local alt left can dish it out but they cannot take it.  It's time they got a taste of their own medicine. 

Several local  alt left troll anyone who dares stand in their way. They go online and harass anyone who dares question their myopic world view. They use the Bernietown mentality of Humboldt to try and hurt conservative and moderate businesses. This includes intimidating moderate Democrats to toe the line or be ostracized. They complain if you tell them off and stand up to them.

The local alt left has no shame. They will lie, gossip, put out nasty inuendoes and rumors. They do it anonymously so they can't be held accountable. If they complain about this new blog would be hypocritical.

Very few people who are moderates or conservatives in this County feel safe speaking out; even privately.

This is happening all over  California and the nation because radical liberals are in a meltdown that their coastal, liberal states and biased media failed to deliver last election. More people are waking up to the intolerant, hypocritical, fascist tactics of the alt left.

More conservatives and moderates should take to social media and start speaking up. Let's see if diversity and inclusion is more than a radical liberal buzzword.

The alt left support like minded businesses and individuals; the conservatives and moderates should as well.

7 comments:

  1. I listened to an interesting short interview with a female writer from Africa. As the website says "The writer talks about the black experience in America, and how the left often cannibalizes itself." http://video.newyorker.com/watch/the-new-yorker-festival-chimamanda-ngozi-adichie

    Listening to it made me think of 1984 and how Big Brother controlled people by controlling what words meant. Reading of how the communists in Russia controlled people the same way, and now I'm listing to a BBC program on how Chairman Mao's programs were responsible for the death of 37 million people from starvation. The radio play is based on the book Tombstone and the author's father died from starvation, caused by the sountry's policies. The book is banned in China. Here's a link for the first episode, for anyone interested (it's BBC online) http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nkwxf
    And yes, the Chinese communists controlled the people by controlling the language.

    A writer friend just finished a book and his editor found fault with where he positioned the adverb "only". Gave him specific instructions on where the word should be placed in a sentence.
    This writer has had other books published, and writes very well. He said nothing about the editor but I got a feeling the editor was just that, and not an actual writer who was paid for his writing.
    I love the English language with all its quirks and changes and I have not just a large, older two volume dictionary, I have several works on English usage which are considered classics. One, Fowler's, is available online for those who love words. Three separate resources said the editor was wrong. I wasn't just defending my friend, I was defending the language itself not to be rigidly defined by someone who does not themself write creatively. By creatively, I don't necessarily mean novels or poetry or scripts for films...but anything which is written to convey not only facts, but interpretations and inferences.

    So people who try to control the language...our language---it belongs to everyone who speaks, reads or writes it---for a political purpose: Know that you are identifying yourself as those who are using language for a specific political purpose. No matter how well you may have been trained to use the right language to obtain the right result from the reader, you cannot brainwash people into completely accepting the meaning of some words.
    You may be able to get the Arcata City Council to parrot your usage of the word "racism" but that doesn't mean anyone else has to accept it. That's one great thing about Humboldt: People don't like being told what to do and how to talk.
    Deal with it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They are against any person who is not fully enveloped into their ideals. This includes Socialists, Libertarians, Independents, and especially the Republicans. Their way is the only way, all others are nazi scum.
    Trevor Louden's lecture video is the most informative I've heard yet, if anybody's interested in learning about the group, watch this short 30 minute lecture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuNKs0RKHtw

    ReplyDelete
  3. A few posts back, your praise for Candace (red pill black) is well deserved, but the praise is also countered with other info about her. Only she knows if she has truly awoken or not. Other video makers have their doubts. One such video creater led me to an older video that Candace has created. We must take everything with a grain of salt, including your blog.
    Be advised to watch this video about her doxxing endeavors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SARo5HtjkQ

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AA, what you put on your blog is up to you. This is my blog. Your opinion that juan,nick and sophie were allies has not been documented. I addressed that concern once.

      In other instances, you provided facebook posts to back up your claim. I am not going to dig through posts three years ago right now for the exact disposition of Nick and Sophie's resolutions but only Juan Ferrer was convicted by a jury of second degree murder.

      I printed your comment above only to correct the misinformation in your comment.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for understanding AA. You know what I go through exposing the truth. You don't want them to have any reason to go after you on technicalities. Trust me, people have no legal standing and still will harass or threaten me because the truth scares them. You are doing good work by bringing information to light and I hope your blog is successful. The people who act out and may attack you or do attack me are a small group and not representative of this community.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.