Jul 2, 2016

Are witnesses for the People in the Kailan Meserve case being pressured to change testimony?

Another delay yet again, in the afternoon on July 1 for the motion to continue sentencing for a new trial and scheduled sentencing for Kailan Meserve. Now, that motion will be heard on July 11 at 4 p.m.

There was a lot of back and forth for Meserve's attorney, Mr. Russ Clanton, to provide good cause, and he reluctantly and finally gave some information, which Judge Timothy Cissna said was still not sufficient for him to make a decision and not specific enough. This information had to be painstakingly coaxed out of Mr. Clanton. Judge Cissna continued the hearing for the motion to continue sentencing, to make sure there were no appeal issues.

Some questions unanswered are: Why is an investigator for the Public Defender working on the Kailan Meserve case? Due process works both ways, what is this secret information that may or may get a new trial for Kailan Meserve? There was some information finally given but the DA's response raises the question, if the defense has anything or is anyone pressuring witnesses to change their testimony.

Ashleigh Groeling's brother is best friends with Kailan Meserve and he testified for Meserve. Groeling testified on behalf of Jane Doe #1.

The afternoon session started out with Judge Timothy Cissna asking Meserve's defense attorney, Mr. Russell Clanton, to address "good cause to continue." Judge Cissna reiterated that he was aware that Mr. Clanton needed transcripts from the jury trial of two witnesses. The transcripts issue has been addressed before.

"We were contacted by two number of potential witnesses and they have material and substantive material for a new trial;" responded Mr. Clanton. Transcripts are needed to show how this evidence would be relevant." Mr. Clanton said he had talked to the court reporter and this would take a month.

"The difficulty I have with this statement is that it is vague and what you said in your motion. I need specifics," said Judge Cissna.

"Number of statements were made by complaining witnesses, evidence refutes some of those statements," said Mr. Clanton. "I am comfortable saying what in chambers, not in open court."

"I don't understand your reluctance," said Judge Cissna. "You will be filing a motion that will lay everything out. I need something other than these vague, non-specific statements. Isn't the DA entitled to question the same witnesses."

"This is a small town," said Mr. Clanton.

"Ultimately, the pleadings are all open record," said Judge Cissna. "You can file a motion now, with a supplemental with transcripts later."

"We had an investigator in this case, that investigator came about a conflict and left the team," said Mr. Clanton. "We acquired a new investigator, Cisco Lassiter, who needs to go over Adam Laird's information."

"How soon can you file a motion without transcripts?" asked Judge Cissna. "Not that it will be decided without transcripts, so the DA can respond?"

Judge Cissna wanted the motion to be filed within a week, Mr. Clanton said 2-3 weeks.

Deputy District Attorney Brie Bennett finally got a chance to weigh in. She told Judge Cissna that "the People are pulling their time waiver for sentencing."

"The defense has not provided good cause for sentencing" said Ms. Bennett. She referred to the same reasoning given by Judge Cissna.

Ms. Bennett added that "the defense has had two and half months to come forward, now they are asking for an additional two to three weeks. This will have a huge impact on the victims and the family."

"I am having serious difficulty because statements are non-specific," said Judge Cissna.

Finally, Mr. Clanton gave up a bit more. "We have been contacted by one of the so called victims that the statements they made under oath, that some of those statements were untrue." Mr. Clanton claimed that another witness said she had discussed testimony with another witness for the People.

Ms. Bennett responded that, "the People have also been contacted by Jane Doe #2 and Ashleigh Groeling that people are encouraging them to change their testimony."

Ms. Bennett also cited People v Alexander and a specific portion, which Judge Cissna took time to look over in court before continuing the hearing.

Jul 1, 2016


Defense not in court, Kailan Meserve sentencing delayed, again




This morning, Kailan Meserve's motion for continuance and scheduled sentencing was delayed yet again, because his attorney, Mr. Russell Clanton, was just boarding a flight from San Francisco. He was supposed to have been back yesterday.

Family members of the victims as well as Meserve's sister, Amy Meserve and Monica Meserve were in court.

After speaking with Kailan Meserve and Mr. Clanton via phone, Judge Timothy Cissna postponed that hearing until 1:30 today.

Jun 28, 2016


Russ Clanton a no show, sends email to court, Kailan Meserve motion for new trial continued

Yesterday afternoon, Judge Timothy Cissna told Deputy District Attorney that a motion for a new trial and a continuance for sentencing will be decided on July 1.

Meserve's attorney, Mr. Russ Clanton, was a no show, simply sending an email that he was out of state.

Jun 24, 2016


It has been two months since Mr. Meserve has been found guilty of 15 felonies. The two victims have a Marcy's right to see restitution and justice." Defense wants new trial.

The defense scheduled a motion to be heard for a new trial yesterday at 4 p.m. for Kailan Meserve. While Mr. David Celli from Mr. Russ Clanton's office was present in court, Kailan Meserve decided in court that he wanted Mr. Clanton present to argue the motion.

The People oppose the motion. Deputy District Attorney Stacey Eads, who appeared on her behalf of her colleague, Ms. Bennett, told Judge Timothy Cissna, "It has been two months since Mr. Meserve has been found guilty of 15 felonies. The two victims have a Marcy's right to see restitution and justice. It has been a significant time since the jury came back with a verdict."

Mr. Celli responded, "

The hearing is now scheduled for June 27 at 4 p.m. in Courtroom 4. Both Ms. Bennett and Mr. Clanton are expected to be at that hearing.

Previous post (with links and coverage):

http://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2016/06/it-has-been-two-months-since-mr-meserve.html?m=1:

2 comments:

  1. Thanks for the update on Meserve. Curious stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Witnesses changing their testimony can be a basis for a new trial, but it places the Judge in a difficult and awkward situation. It attempts to make him the 13th Juror because he has no idea of what the deliberations centered on. What was significant and what was not. Absent any government interference that caused the witnesses to change or fabricate their testimony, these motions almost always fail. It appears to be reminiscent of the Littlefield case wherein the Defense investigator wrote a declaration for the juror (in that case) to sign. None of this passes the smell test. I believe the motion will be denied and Meserve will spend the rest of his life in prison.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.