In Citizens for a Better Eureka v. City of Eureka, case number A170214 in the California First Apellate District, the final disposition and an opinion was issued today.
"The order dismissing the petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief is affirmed. Respondents and the Tribe are awarded costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1), (2).)"
So far, Citizens for a Better Eureka and Brad Johnson 0; City of Eureka, former City of Eureka attorney Autumn Luna and Wiyot Tribe 2. Humboldt Superior Court Retired Judge John Feeney's ruling affirmed.
I am not going to add the entire ruling. You can read it online if you want. Other than lawyers and people who think CEQA is "exciting reading", most of the 22 pages will bore the average reader. I have added 4 pages that should give even a new reader some basic information.
I have contacted the City of Eureka; Wiyot tribe's attorney Ms. Siena Kalina, associate at Berkey Williams LLP and Citizens for a Better Eureka spokesperson Gail Rymer. City of Eureka Assistant Manager and Clerk Pam Powell has forwarded my request to current City of Eureka Attorney, Mr. Robert Black. Ms. Rymer is also working on getting me a response. Replies will be added to the post which could be today but more likely tomorrow.
Some previous posts:
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2025/02/oral-argument-waived-in-cbe-appeal.html?m=1
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2025/01/for-those-still-interested-in-cbe-vs.html?m=1
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2025/01/city-of-eurekas-response-in-appeal.html?m=1
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2024/11/city-of-eureka-gets-extension-of-30.html?m=1
**The search feature on the blog will allow you to access previous coverage and every single post**
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.