He was arraigned on May 10.
Nunez is charged with two misdemeanors.Count 1 is Unauthorized Invasion of Privacy and Count 2 is Annoy/Molest Child under 18. Count 1 is under the California "peeping tom" laws.
In Count 1, Nunez is alleged to have used a camera without consent to take pictures of Jane Doe #1 born in 1982. In Count 2, the alleged victim is Jane Doe #2, born in 1998.
This is a selfie from the cell phone retrieved and posted on Kym Kemp's website.
May 10, 2016
Sohum upskirting suspect arraigned, hires out of area attorney, next court date June 1
David Nunez was scheduled to be arraigned this morning in Courtroom 3. Ms. Kathleen Bryson, local attorney, made a special appearance on behalf of Nunez's attorney, Mr. William Du Bois, from Pleasanton.
Nunez was not present.
His warrant was recalled. Next court date June 1 in Courtroom 2. Deputy District Whitney Barnes present for the people.
Nunez was not present.
His warrant was recalled. Next court date June 1 in Courtroom 2. Deputy District Whitney Barnes present for the people.
Apr 21, 2016
Sohum upskirting suspect to be arraigned May 10; charged with two misdemeanors
While the public computer still showed no date, a bit more research resulted in me finding out that David Nunez is scheduled to be arraigned on May 10 at 8 a.m. Courtroom to be announced.
Nunez is charged with two misdemeanors. Count 1 is use of camera without consent. Count 2 Annoy/Molest a child under 18 years.
On March 6, I did this post. According to both UnderSheriff William Honsal and confirmed below by Sgt. Jesse Taylor,
This link has posts from Kym Kemp, who first reported the story.
http://kymkemp.com/2016/02/24/upskirting-case-moves-to-the-district-attorneys-investigators/
Nunez is charged with two misdemeanors. Count 1 is use of camera without consent. Count 2 Annoy/Molest a child under 18 years.
On March 6, I did this post. According to both UnderSheriff William Honsal and confirmed below by Sgt. Jesse Taylor,
"This case is wrapping up and I have identified a suspect. The case is being forwarded to the DA’s Office for charges. The identity of this person won’t be revealed until the DA decides to file charges."
http://kymkemp.com/2016/02/24/upskirting-case-moves-to-the-district-attorneys-investigators/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.