"No, we are talking about the difference between negligence and intentional"

Mr. Paul Sequeira who is prosecuting the Jason Warren case decimated the defense's main witness, traffic collision reconstruction consultant, Steven Walker during cross examination this morning.

Mr. Sequeira started his cross examination by getting Walker to agree with his statement, "There's no question that the joggers were hit from behind." He further got Walker to admit that he was not asked to estimate speed by the defense. Mr. Sequeira got Walker to admit there were no mechanical defects in the KIA; he got Walker to back off and unsuccessfully justify his claims in the report that the road where the collision happened was dangerous and that the driver was out of control when he hit the three joggers and the Jessica Hunt's dog.

Using google maps, Walker's own words and reports, Mr. Sequeira got the jury's attention and was able to completely unravel Walker's theory and report.

At one point Walker trying to save his report said that  a driver involved in an accident would bring in question of he was a good driver.

Mr. Sequeira responded with, ""No, we are talking about the difference between negligence and intentional."

full update later...