Is Peter Martin hurting for actual clients because he sure has a lot of free time to collect attorney fees on behalf of "causes"

Read a local headline with a government agency or non-profit and then lawsuit on behalf of (insert name here), most likely it will have attorney Peter Martin's name.

Now the self appointed media that loves to talk about conflict of interests, is just fine with Peter Martin's advocacy on behalf of his clients because "it is his job."

The prayer lawsuit filed by Carole Beaton is just one example of selective tolerance on the part of most liberals. If you do not believe as they do, they will sue. Trying to talk and find compromise in a calm manner is not profitable for the likes of Peter Martin.

Or for that matter, Richard Salzman or BayKeeper. Do these liberal activists/attorneys ever earn money that is not made by suing someone?

Freedom of speech and separation of religion to the sue happy liberals outweighs the rights of those who do believe, especially Christianity.

While people are being beheaded in the Middle East and fleeing from their homes, locally some people are threatened by prayer. Most of these people probably voted for Obama who has shown no leadership in the recent Mid-East crisis. After all, Christian lives are not worth the same as any other life.

In  liberal world that some of these sue happy liberals live in, as long as you believe and think exactly they way they want you to, you are a good person. The recent settlement of the prayer lawsuit by the City of Eureka proves only one thing. When you cannot win or convince people of your cause by reason, you bully and sue.

Let the attacks begin. Of course, they won't be on my blog. The truth is very inconvenient for the local blowhards.

Each time an atheist or non-believer sues, it is good in a way. They sure spend a lot of time trying to fight someone they do not believe exists. They are sure threatened by some words.

In addition to Humboldt's underground economy, we should add another economy, the sue happy economy.

As for city resources, if this would be something that the liberal community believed in, there would be no outcry.

Previous post:
Those who can do, do; those who cannot sue
http://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2013_05_01_archive.html