A hearing is scheduled tomorrow morning at 9 a.m. for status of ruling and the OSC was continued. I confirmed it is still on calendar.
Judge Ksenia Tsenin issued her ruling. It is basically the same. Then suspended her judgement. Now she is back to basically the same ruling. The arguments have been the same.
Tomorrow, there is a hearing on for status of Judge Tsenin's ruling. 2/27: All that happened was Judge Tsenin asked us if we received her ruling. I responded "electronically, yes." She then said the OSC requested by Kreis "was moot." "For the record, I will state it is denied." It should have been denied when he filed it because Kreis had no legal basis. I had filed a motion to vacate and an appeal and a small claims judgement is automatically stayed for 30 days to allow those options.
I am going to appeal. I had already filed that request and there is currently a hearing date scheduled for that trial de novo next Monday. I mentioned several times the concerns about that date when Judge Tsenin hadn't even issued her final rulings.
One thing I found out through this process is not every attorney, including local civil attorneys, know small claims procedures, rules and law. The same applies to judges. Judge Tsenin hears all cases assigned to Kreis in Humboldt. That does not mean she should have been assigned this civil case.
To appoint a judge who is assigned to Humboldt Superior Court specifically because of the many recusals and conflicts created by Kreis and who is getting a paycheck because of him to preside over a case involving him was a poor choice and bad optics.
Related posts:
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2024/09/the-county-pays-kreis-for-cases-he-is.html?m=1
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2024/09/gregory-kreis-ordered-to-information.html?m=1
https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2024/10/gregory-kreis-was-appointed-to-at-least.html?m=1
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.