This is the last post I did on Brett Watson. I covered his criminal case, the case filed by the City of Arcata in which a permanent restraining order was granted for three years and his violation of probation.
Look at the number of posts I did on Watson from 2021 and, as usual, I covered what other media did not bother to or ignored.
On 6/10, 2022 case filed by the City of Arcata against Watson is scheduled in front of Humboldt Superior Court Judge Timothy Canning who granted the restraining order on March 17, 2023 for three years.
It is for the renewal of the workplace restraining harassment order. It was continued from 6/8/26. Watson already requested one continuance before that date on 4/13.
There have been a lot of developments including an appeal filed by Watson in federal court. It was denied.
San Diego attorney Ms. Kathryn Fox is the attorney for City of Arcata. Watson has hired a new attorney from Santa Rosa, Mr. Joel Fleck.
Commissioner Sarah Kaber is disqualified. I will add the declaration by Arcata City Manager Merritt Perry.
Most locals are familiar with the details of City of Arcata vs Watson and I have court documents in prior coverage.
1:40 p.m.: No other media is here. No one in the courtroom. Attorneys, witnesses and Watson all are on Zoom.
Mr. Fleck continued his cross examination of Danielle Allred, Contracts & Special Projects Manager for City of Arcata. There was some confusion since earlier, the name stated was Danette Demello. It is very hard to hear some people on Zoom, especially in Courtroom 4. Even the clerk and sometimes the judge have to ask people to speak up. Court minutes are in draft form for 6/10 and not complete but I did confirm the name and the witness was Allred.
Allred made a statement about speaking to other people.
Mr. Fleck, "So you were encouraged?"
Allred clarified she asked the City of Arcata "HR director whether it was okay to speak to a particular individual who could not testify."
Mr. Fleck was particularly interested if Allred spoke with Arcata Councilmember Meredith Matthews. "Were you aware Meredith Matthews brought this motion to renew the restraining order?"
He stated, "Most people you spoke to was in 2021, 2022, 2023?"
2:20 p.m. Hearing is still going on. Testifying is former City of Arcata attorney Nancy Diamond. She testified about an email mentioned in the court documents, allegedly sent by Watson. She called him self serving.
2:40 p.m Watson testified as a rebuttal witness.
Ms. Fox, "Has he made other email addresses in the past?"
Diamond testified about Watson's computer savviness. She mentioned local media coverage in the past. "The comments included cute and fictitious characters."
Diamond testified that she believed some of the online commenters on local media leaving comments favorable to Watson in October 2022 were made by him. Diamond mentioned users' names and the similarities to City of Arcata employees.
"Amelia Sinkhorn is very close to Emily Sinkhorn, the City of Arcata Environmental Director," said Diamond. "Emily Goldstein is close to Delilah Goldstein, another Councilmember."
You can come to your own conclusions whether Diamond was correct if a "strange" email sent to her was from Watson and about the online comments.
I blocked Watson years ago while covering his case and my own experience with him at that time made me agree with the original restraining order. These are ineffective, especially in Humboldt. There are many obsessive people in this County and they get fixated on people for years. If you have not experienced this firsthand, you cannot understand what the City of Arcata is going through.
I have experienced several people who have multiple email addresses, create multiple anon accounts and leave clues about their alleged identity. It is one reason I don't allow or trust anon accounts.
Witnesses are being questioned about information and the court documents have enough. This hearing did not need to go on for two days but Watson and Fleck will drag it out with unnecessary questions and waste time. Even there is a ruling today, I will update when it is concluded and if court minutes are available tomorrow.
6/11/26: Court minutes are still in draft form, there is no future date listed but there is an signed order from Judge Canning stating restraining order in this matter granted 3/17/23 is in effect until 9/8/26.
I will add court minutes later when they are available. I need to go through court documents to see what I included in prior coverage. I don't know when that will be. I want to wait for Judge Canning's ruling about the renewal before I waste time adding all documents. Very few people are going to look through all the court documents and I provide them for free.
The other media did not show up. If they cover this now because they read and follow me but you heard it here first from original reporting.