tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681108704390260122.post976153505749691857..comments2023-05-21T09:23:06.735-07:00Comments on John Chiv: Federal judge orders U.S. government to release or grant hearings to 1,000 asylum seekersJohn Chivhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14325700128778718091noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681108704390260122.post-43734128477117874762018-07-03T17:35:31.869-07:002018-07-03T17:35:31.869-07:00Thank you Allan. My beef is with the illegal Board...Thank you Allan. My beef is with the illegal Boarder crossings that get to by pass the system. However seeking Asylum should be based on political or religious persecution. Not showing up in mass claming persecution intentionally overwhelming the system then demanding to be released while awaiting their hearing possibly never to be seen again thus making them yet another illegal draining resources. If one is truly in peril one can easily seek asylum at the American Embassy in their country or and adjacent country thus avoiding the perilous thousand plus mile Journey to the American Border. But that doesn't fit the liberal progressive socialist agenda and agenda to make a Socialist American and to make Socialist American they need voters and that's what they have at the Boarer. There's nothing racist about it it's pure politics and you know it.Rusty tohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05076772536165187256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681108704390260122.post-30145177117392579902018-07-03T11:33:03.565-07:002018-07-03T11:33:03.565-07:00Rusty: The article points to hearings for Asylum s...Rusty: The article points to hearings for Asylum seekers. Presenting yourself at the border of this country requesting asylum does not make you illegal. In fact Asylum is codified in both international agreements that the US is signatory to as well as in Federal law. Every passenger on the Mayflower was in effect seeking asylum in these lands. So Asylum is ingrained in our history and cultural heritage. For 150 years, you just came to this country on a boat. It was when race based restrictions reared their ugly head (around 1924) deciding who can come and who can’t that this became a political debate.Allan Dollisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09398369900020387507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681108704390260122.post-15388884170825574882018-07-02T21:02:00.344-07:002018-07-02T21:02:00.344-07:00It's rediculous to grant hearings to illegals....It's rediculous to grant hearings to illegals. Grant them trials for the crime of entering the Country illegally first. Will this ruling survive and appeal?Rusty tohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05076772536165187256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681108704390260122.post-42094947361438347812018-07-02T20:09:38.393-07:002018-07-02T20:09:38.393-07:00The one point none of the articles on this decisio...The one point none of the articles on this decision make is that if has been years, it was before the Trump administration.John Chivhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14325700128778718091noreply@blogger.com